Cambodia

Chronic Poverty in Rural Cambodia: Quality of Growth for Whom?

Author

Ippei Tsuruga

Status

Prepared for a research project entitled ‘Quality of Growth’ in collaboration with Institute of Development Studies (IDS), French Development Agency (AFD), and JICA Research Institute.

Availability

The Povertist (pdf)
JICA Research Institute In: Growth is Dead, Long Live Growth. (pdf)
JICA Research Institute Working Paper No. 104

Summary

With the post-2015 era approaching, debates surrounding poverty have started seriously considering what makes for quality growth in order to eliminate extreme poverty, rather than just reduce it. Zero poverty cannot be realised without tackling chronic poverty. However, poverty reduction policies hardly consider particular situations and characteristics of the chronically poor due to lack of data and evidence. In order to fill such research gaps, this paper examines the trend and characteristics of chronic poverty in rural Cambodia between 2004 and 2010. Applying a blend of nationally representative qualitative (participatory poverty assessment) and quantitative sources (household survey), I primarily estimate chronic poverty headcount rates, based on criteria defined by the poor. Surprisingly, despite the excellent progress in economic development, the chronic poverty headcount ratio barely improved from 11 percent. The result implies that rapid economic growth has successfully raised the consumption of chronically poor households but done little to help them accumulate productive assets and human capital to break a vicious cycle of poverty. Structural constraints are identified in their demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, including: limited asset ownership, low human development, female-heads of household, high child dependency, fewer economically active members, small household size and many young members. From a policy perspective, one striking finding is that consumption measurements based on the current national poverty line cannot be used to identify a majority of the chronic poor. This is not merely a matter of different measurement applications because the chronically poor identified in this study are just as deprived as the consumption-based poor in some other attributes like human development. The evidence suggests that poverty reduction programmes should take into consideration the multidimensional criteria identified here to avoid leaving the chronically poor behind in the country’s development. This policy implication is particularly important for targeting mechanisms of social protection instruments implemented under the National Social Protection Strategy, which are key measures in ending poverty in Cambodia.

 

Keywords – Chronic Poverty, Combining Methods, Multidimensional Poverty, Social Protection, Targeting, Cambodia

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

four × 4 =